On the other hand, having made this choice myself over a decade ago, I am at a loss for words by the incomprehension that the discourse now reflects.
What Betty Friedan did so brilliantly over 40 years ago in her groundbreaking work, The Feminine Mystique, was to describe the cultural coercion that led women to believe they were destined to be housewives. It is exactly thus of her work that I have never felt the burden of such antiquated expectations. What did, genuinely, drive me to abandon my career as a lawyer were societal forces that have been given surprisingly little attention indoors the latest decide-out conversation. The rationalization why for this may very well be that what underlies these forces is as sexy as tree bark. Economics.
Suburban Connecticut is outrageously wealthy. The regular cost of a home in Greenwich is over $2.6 million. Enough said. The jobs that create this wealth just do not support the two-task versions that have been posited as a answer to the decide-out crisis. To the contrary, obtaining this echelon of wealth requires a stage of commitment that stretches people to their human limits, and necessitates the entire abdication of family responsibilities to others.
It isn't very stunning that no matter where they commence, the families which are shaped round these jobs gravitate towards an whole division of labor the moneymaker and the caretaker and become part of a highly specialized economy that makes the two-task model not handiest impractical, but verging on aberrant. Husbands are unavailable. Houses are enormous. And schools are constructed across the presumption that a parent will be plausible in any respect times. Add to this the exorbitant earnings of the primary moneymaker that makes a 2d earnings inconsequential, and the dimensions is tipped right off its hinges in favor of the single-task family.
There are two truths at work here. First, is the reality that these jobs will never modification. Driven by the heart and soul of capitalism, they are the jobs of the wolves. And even as token efforts are made to accommodate families, there'll perpetually be someone willing to make greater sacrifices.
The 2d truth is that we are nowhere near the roughly social upheaval quintessential for males and females to swap their roles within these families. This is what continues to be of the traditionalist gender expectations Friedan wrote about, and indeed not even the optimal stringent back-to-work advocates suggests this as a viable answer. After 3 years working as a wolf myself, first as a banker and then as a lawyer, I saw first hand that for a girl to pursue these jobs and have a family, she would have to to find not just a husband, but a wife as well.
As I read the back-to-work literature now, it seems my life is a case analyze indoors the pitfalls of opting-out. Leslie Bennetts in The Feminine Mistake, sets them out relatively hardily. I lost my financial independence, watched my self-esteem deteriorate. And I fell readily into the trap of being the ideally suited mommy making natural little one delicacies and obsessively organizing my kitchen drawers. But the time I spent with my kids was profoundly essential to me. Given our family structure and the realm we lived in, the choice was the proper one. For every of the matters I gave up, I would not rewrite my own historical prior. There are not any effortless answers here.
Still, I am thankful to be leaving the decide-out universe for a career as a writer that is both family friendly and hugely lucrative. It is ironic that the years I spent in that universe led me to become a writer, and gave me a factor essential to write down about. I have great empathy for my peers who battle with the consequences of an not probable decision. And I evaluate myself lucky that I have found out a way round them. The cages that hold us may perhaps be gilded, but they are still cages. And the forces we are up towards are nothing less than these on the very core of our tradition.
Wendy Walker 2007